Tian-Tian Sun vs Melinda Czink Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W L L W W L
Form
W W L W W W L W L LHead-2-Head: Sun 1 - 2 Czink
They have played 7 sets in total, with Sun winning 3 and Czink winning 4. The last match between Sun and Czink was at the Family Circle Cup - Charleston, 13-04-2008, Q3, Clay with Tian-Tian Sun getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tian-Tian Sun | 1 |
| Melinda Czink | 2 |
Family Circle Cup - Charleston(13-04-2008)
6
2
7
5
| Sun | Stats | Czink |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 77 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 43 | Age | 42 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 3 | Titles | 14 |
| 56% (159-127) | Career Total W/L | 55% (370-301) |
| $170,010 | Career Prize Money | $514,237 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Korda VS Cina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Tian-Tian Sun
Player
Melinda Czink
52%
(
33 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-1 0-6 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 6-3 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 28 | Games Won | 31 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 52% (33/63) | 1st Serve % | 61% (46/76) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (28/46) |
| 70% (21/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (12/30) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 47% (36/76) | Return Points Win % | 33% (21/63) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tian-Tian Sun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yurika Sema
Player
Tian-Tian Sun
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
105)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Melinda Czink Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vitalia Diatchenko
Player
Melinda Czink
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yafan Wang
Player
Melinda Czink
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
48%
(
43 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(2) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (159/127) | Win/Loss | 55% (370/301) |
| 55% (361/294) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (842/724) |
| 52% (3096/2825) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (7483/6995) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (164/141) |
| 47% (28/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (149/110) |
| 33% (4/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (25/22) |
| 45% (9/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 53% (32/28) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 107 | Aces Total | 622 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 150 | Total Double Faults | 1202 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 482.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 538.41 |
| 65% (2740/4229) | 1st Serve % | 63% (11188/17857) |
| 60% (1639/2740) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (7139/11188) |
| 45% (675/1495) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3029/6622) |
| 46% (220/481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (839/1923) |
| 43% (1859/4275) | Return Points Win % | 42% (7411/17630) |
| 56% (19/15) | Slam W/L | 43% (29/39) |
| 42% (13/18) | Masters W/L | 45% (26/32) |
| 29% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (75/66) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (132/129) |
| 69% (48/22) | Challenger W/L | 65% (180/99) |
| 67% (2/1) | Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 55% (157/284) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (366/657) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 60% (33/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (81/162) |
| 46% (39/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (133/237) |
| 83% (164/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (350/294) |
| 16% (164/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (350/56) |
| 17% (122/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (321/77) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
